Author(s):
- Oksanych Iryna Hryhorivna, ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4570-711X
- Belska Viktoriia Yuriivna, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5805-5838
- Krokhalov Oleksandr Oleksandrovych, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5083-1314
DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2307-9770.2024.12.02.01
Paper Language: UKR
Abstract
In the process of working on the implementation of the rating system for assessing the student's academic achievements, the methods of forming a rating assessment were considered, the necessity of developing a rating assessment was substantiated, and the general algorithm of the rating system for assessing the results of current student control was described. Based on the analysis of progressive pedagogical experience, the structure of the rating assessment of students' academic achievements according to the content and structural components of professional training is determined and a mathematical model of rating assessment is developed. The scientific novelty of the results obtained is that the mathematical model of rating assessment of students' academic achievements in higher education institutions has been improved by applying the weighting coefficients of the criteria included in the integral assessment after group examination; an algorithm for determining the rating of the applicant has been developed. The research carried out in this paper can be used in the development of mathematical software in automated systems designed for education. The development of a mathematical model of rating assessment and the development of an algorithm for assigning rating grades of knowledge pave the way for a more objective and effective measurement of students' academic achievements. This contributes not only to improving the quality of education, but also ensures a more accurate correspondence between grades and students' actual academic achievements, which is critical for their professional development and competitiveness in the labor market. Areas for further research: Analyzing the impact of self-assessment on students' understanding and improvement of their own learning achievements; studying how different cultures perceive and respond to rating systems; analyzing the possibilities of using technologies, such as artificial intelligence, to improve rating systems and reduce subjectivity.
Keywords
higher education institutions, organization of the educational process, activation of students' independent work, evaluation criteria, rating points
References
1. The Law of Ukraine "On Education". URL: http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/cgi-bin/laws/main.cgi?nreg=1060-12 (accessed 20.10.2023). [in Ukrainian]
2. International standards of education quality. URL: http://uadocs.exdat.com/docs/index-70147.html (accessed 20.10.2023). [in Ukrainian]
3. Viktorov, V. G. (2006). Regulation of the quality of education as a philosophical and educational problem: PhD thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy: 09.00.10; Institute of Higher Education of the Academy of Pedagogical Sciences of Ukraine. K.: Naukova Dumka, 30. [in Ukrainian]
4. Кінаш І. П. Якість освіти як результат, процес та освітня система / Науковий вісник НЛТУ України: збірник науково-технічних праць. Львів: РВВ НЛТУ України. 2011. Вип. 21(5). С. 363-368.
5. Kisil, M. V. (2005). Assessment of the quality of higher education. Dnipropetrovs'k: Nauka i Osvita, 82. [in Ukrainian]
6. Гаєвська Л. А. Управління освітою: нові пріоритети / Проблеми та перспективи входження України в європейський інтелектуальний простір: освітні аспекти: збірник науково-експертних матеріалів. К. : Санспарель, 2009. С. 73-79.
7. Головань М. С. Компетенція і компетентність: досвід теорії, теорія досвіду. Вища освіта України. 2008. № 3. С. 23-30.
8. Murashko, M. I., Nazarko, S. O. (2010). Formation of a model for assessing the quality of higher education and the possibility of its implementation in the system of training. Bulletin of Chernihiv State Technological University. Series "Economic Sciences": collection of scientific papers. URL: http://www.nbuv.gov.ua/portal/Soc_Gum/Vcndtu/2010_43/16.html (accessed 05.11.2023). [in Ukrainian]
9. Mazaraki, A. A. (Ed.) (2007). Modern Educational Technologies in Higher Education: Materials of the Scientific and Methodological Conference. Kyiv, November 1-2, 259. [in Ukrainian]
10. Гладуш В. А. Педагогіка вищої школи: теорія, практика, історія: навчальний посібник. Д., 2014. 416 с.
11. Козяр М. М., Коваль М. С. Педагогіка вищої школи: навчальний посібник. К. : Знання, 2013. 327
12. (2016). System of diagnostics of knowledge and skills of students in higher education. URL: pedagogy-h.blogspot.com / 2016/10/3 html (accessed 06.11.2023). [in Ukrainian]
13. Sikorskyi, P. I. (2006). Modeling of didactic assessment systems. Shlyakh obrazovaniya, 2, 2-6. [in Ukrainian]
14. Голубєва Н. В. Комп’ютерне тестування як одна з форм сучасного контролю знань / Інформаційно-телекомунікаційні технології в сучасній освіті: досвід, проблеми, перспективи : зб. наук.пр. Львів : ЛДУБЖД, 2006. Вип. 1. С. 309-313.
15. Egan, J. (2012). E-learning Factsheet of CIPD. URL: http://www.cipd.co.uk(accessed 06.11.2023).
16. Der Technischen Hohschule. E-Learning. URL: http:// elearning.fhws.de. (accessed 06.11.2023).
17. Rogova, T. V. (2015). The problem of education quality management in scientific literature and educational practice. Pedagogy and psychology: a collection of scientific works, 51, 211-218. [in Ukrainian]
18. Rogova, T. V. (2017). Professional training of students in universities: its features and quality. Collection of scientific works "Pedagogy and Psychology"., 56, 294-301. [in Ukrainian]
19. Shevchuk, S. S. (2021). Educational and methodological activity of a teacher of VET on the basis of a competence-based approach: a study guide. BINPO DZVO "UMO" NPU, Bila Tserkva, Ukraine, 73. [in Ukrainian]
20. Lukyanchenko, N. D. (2011). The problem of the quality of professional training of specialists. Bulletin of the East Ukrainian National University named after Volodymyr Dahl, 16, 50-53. [in Ukrainian]